DMA


MORE STORIES YSR urges PM to form team to manage Satyam affairs Andrew Strauss named England captain Ramalinga Raju: From Andhra's pride to disgrace Film on Raja Ravi Varma worth a watch: Randeep Hooda Striking truckers hope government will talk to them 'Prabhakaran's extradition call shows India's stand on LTTE' We need more short films to promote young talent: Anupam Kher Ashok Leyland sales down 63 percent in December BJP draws roadmap to general elections, sticks to terror Mamata's acts are childish: Biman Bose
© 2008-2010 Dmanewsdesk.com
- All Rights Reserved.
Corporates should pay more for cases in SC, HC: Parliamentary Committee October 29, 2008
New Delhi, A Parliamentary Standing Committee on Law and Justice has stated that the Supreme Court and High Courts should charge corporate commercial bodies a higher fee for settling their disputes and give a fee-waiver to poor and illiterate litigants.

While pressing for a differential court fee system, the Committee stated, "The Committee draws the attention of the Executive and the Judiciary to arrive at a decision regarding differential court fees for the commercial or corporate or company matters immediately and amend the Supreme Court Rules, High Court Rules and other court fees Acts accordingly."

In a report to the Parliament, the Committee''s chairman E M S Natchiappan, criticised the preference that corporate bodies get in courts while a common litigant waits for justice for years.

"Early hearing and disposals of cases by the courts in corporate cases only delay the cases of ordinary citizens as they take valuable court time within minimum court fees, therefore, there is a strong case for a differential court fee for the corporate sector," said Natchiappan.

He further said that the judicial system is already clogged by a huge number of cases and in such a scenario, preference to corporate cases that too on minimum court fees may amount to taking away the time meant for the common litigant.

Natchiappan said that corporate bodies can get their disputes resolved through the methods of arbitration and conciliation. However, in most cases arbitration involves a higher cost. So the corporate bodies make use of the judicial infrastructure.
EMAIL THIS NEWS COMMENTS No comments yet

LEAVE YOUR COMMENT
Name (required)
Email (required but will not be published)
Website (e.g. www.dmanewsdesk.com)
City
Comment (required)
Nation Polling ends in Chhattisgarh with impressive turnout New fund to restart Delhi's stalled infrastructure projects India to launch a manned mission to space Group of Ministers formulate six-point strategy for peace in Orissa Polling begins on enthusiastic note in Chhattisgarh Congress opts for wait and watch policy on Hindu terrorism Inflation currently not a problem in India: Montek DHL partners UNICEF to empower communities to improve child survival in Maharashtra RSS, Bajrang Dal are not terrorist groups: Britain BJP promises to make Delhi 'one of the best cities in the world' J & K Poll will be full of surprises ATS is torturing me, says Sadhvi Pragya Elections were held under the gun in Kashmir: Mirwaiz Kashmir voters brave chill, boycott to vote for better future Bihar to improve governance with British help Bal Thackeray compared with Gandhi, Shivaji in party mouthpiece Raj Thackeray secures bail after arrest Congress assesses damage by BSP in Delhi Orissa government allows Hindu rally despite centre's objection J & K Political Scene is changing for good
  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92 
 PREV  |  NEXT