DMA


MORE STORIES YSR urges PM to form team to manage Satyam affairs Andrew Strauss named England captain Ramalinga Raju: From Andhra's pride to disgrace Film on Raja Ravi Varma worth a watch: Randeep Hooda Striking truckers hope government will talk to them 'Prabhakaran's extradition call shows India's stand on LTTE' We need more short films to promote young talent: Anupam Kher Ashok Leyland sales down 63 percent in December BJP draws roadmap to general elections, sticks to terror Mamata's acts are childish: Biman Bose
© 2008-2010 Dmanewsdesk.com
- All Rights Reserved.
Corporates should pay more for cases in SC, HC: Parliamentary Committee October 29, 2008
New Delhi, A Parliamentary Standing Committee on Law and Justice has stated that the Supreme Court and High Courts should charge corporate commercial bodies a higher fee for settling their disputes and give a fee-waiver to poor and illiterate litigants.

While pressing for a differential court fee system, the Committee stated, "The Committee draws the attention of the Executive and the Judiciary to arrive at a decision regarding differential court fees for the commercial or corporate or company matters immediately and amend the Supreme Court Rules, High Court Rules and other court fees Acts accordingly."

In a report to the Parliament, the Committee''s chairman E M S Natchiappan, criticised the preference that corporate bodies get in courts while a common litigant waits for justice for years.

"Early hearing and disposals of cases by the courts in corporate cases only delay the cases of ordinary citizens as they take valuable court time within minimum court fees, therefore, there is a strong case for a differential court fee for the corporate sector," said Natchiappan.

He further said that the judicial system is already clogged by a huge number of cases and in such a scenario, preference to corporate cases that too on minimum court fees may amount to taking away the time meant for the common litigant.

Natchiappan said that corporate bodies can get their disputes resolved through the methods of arbitration and conciliation. However, in most cases arbitration involves a higher cost. So the corporate bodies make use of the judicial infrastructure.
EMAIL THIS NEWS COMMENTS No comments yet

LEAVE YOUR COMMENT
Name (required)
Email (required but will not be published)
Website (e.g. www.dmanewsdesk.com)
City
Comment (required)
Nation HOW WILL CHIDAMBARAM RESPOND TO TERRORISM? No military action against Pakistan, says Mukherjee Air India fuel surcharge to fall by Rs 400 from Dec 2 SOME UGLY ASPECTS OF ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS India's political spectrum unite in combating terrorism Lakshmi Mittal richest person in South Africa again Zero tolerance only answer to terrorism: Congress Dawood gang provided logistics to Lashkar militants Three nights and three days later, Mumbai's terror trauma ends Mumbai standoff over, polling picks up in Delhi Assembly elections: A litmus test for Rahul Gandhi Taj hotel cleared of militants, 59-hour terror drama ends India likely to compensate Nepal for damage caused by breach in Kosi embankment Oberoi-Trident cleared, says NSG; 2 terrorists killed Capital Debate Terror denouement begins as Oberoi cleared, Pranab points to Pakistan Terrorists were trained, knew hotel layout: commandos Taj operations to be wrapped up in hours: Indian Army (Lead) Wrap up operations in matter of hours: Indian Army Madhya Pradesh elections end with 60 percent voter turnout
  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92 
 PREV  |  NEXT