DMA


MORE STORIES Why smokers struggle to quit and fail Hasina chooses 25 novice ministers, makes personal physician foreign minister Malik wants to guide Pakistan to the top Skin sizzles in Bollywood - and it's not a problem Striking truckers hope government will talk to them 'Prabhakaran's extradition call shows India's stand on LTTE' We need more short films to promote young talent: Anupam Kher Ashok Leyland sales down 63 percent in December BJP draws roadmap to general elections, sticks to terror Mamata's acts are childish: Biman Bose
© 2008-2010 Dmanewsdesk.com
- All Rights Reserved.
Chinese lawyers sue CNN for damages over comments April 23, 2008
Beijing, April 23: Fourteen Chinese lawyers have filed a lawsuit seeking damages from CNN after one of its commentators called the Chinese "goons" and "thugs".

The plaintiffs from the Beijing Huanzhong & Partners law firm demanded in the suit filed Monday with the Chaoyang Court here that CNN and its commentator Jack Cafferty issue a public apology and pay each of them 100 yuan ($14.30) in compensation for causing them mental distress.

It is not immediately known if or when the court will hear the case.

During an appearance on "The Situation Room," a programme aired April 9, Cafferty, speaking about the US trade deficit with China, used words like "goons and thugs" to refer to the Chinese.

"We continue to import their junk with the lead paint on them and the poisoned pet food and export, you know, jobs to places where you can pay workers a dollar a month to turn out the stuff that we're buying from Wal-Mart," Caffer said.

"So I think our relationship with China has certainly changed," he said, "I think they're basically the same bunch of goons and thugs they've been for the last 50 years."

CNN issued a statement last week in which it said Cafferty had made critical comments about many governments, including the US. "On this occasion Jack was offering his strongly held opinion of the Chinese government, not the Chinese people," said CNN in the statement.

Liu Jing, one of the plaintiffs, said the statement lacked sincerity and would never be treated as an apology.

She said the remarks made by Cafferty gravely infringed upon her reputation and dignity as a Chinese and had caused severe spiritual and psychological harm.

She said that Cafferty's remarks violated the Chinese constitution and the General Principles of the Civil Law, which state that human dignity should not be infringed upon.
EMAIL THIS NEWS COMMENTS No comments yet

LEAVE YOUR COMMENT
Name (required)
Email (required but will not be published)
Website (e.g. www.dmanewsdesk.com)
City
Comment (required)
Nation The political class is in deep turmoil Britain, India to co-produce films Teachers find letters, money in answer sheets Railway construction work hit as rebels strike in Assam For India's 'missile woman', it is all about rocket science Incredible India scores more hits 'I could be working in a call centre' Congress needs to firm up alliances US report picks holes in India's track record in fighting terror MP's allegations put Congress in the dock Photojournalist pays with life to capture live gun battle There's a complaint against every 10th Delhi policeman This roadside eatery gets 7,000 foodies every day Soldier who killed last militant dies in hospital PM hindering West Bengal's growth: Bhattacharjee From Pokhran-II to nuclear deal, it's been a long journey Queensland premier's son to pursue 'Bollywood dreams' India's Sri Lanka power project runs into Tamil storm Bhimani to lend voice to Nobel laureate's work Voting begins in 89 constituencies in Karnataka
  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92 
 PREV  |  NEXT